I actually took a cultural anthropology class for my
cultural diversity credit, so I knew a lot of the information contained in
these pages. The first half of the class covered everything in the Ethnography Wikipedia
page, and then the second half of the class was all about different cultures.
While the Wikipedia page was not very interesting, I
know for a fact that this research can be very interesting. There are so many
cultures out there that we never know about. For example, the Nacirema who have
daily rituals involving putting bundles of hog hairs in their mouths and moving
it around. They also actually make holes in their teeth bigger through
instruments used by holy-mouth-men (See http://www.ohio.edu/people/thompsoc/body.html
for more information). This sounds so crazy and disgusting to us, but is it
really? It is all a matter of perception, which is formed by culture.
Ethnographies are meant to observe the culture and
learn how it developed based on many factors. This is very difficult because to
fully understand the culture, they have to immerse themselves in it. I found
this part of the task very difficult. Cultures just don’t accept you overnight.
Ethnographers sometimes have to spend years in cultures just to be accepted. I
cannot imagine personally devoting such a huge chuck of my life to this pursuit.
It just doesn’t seem worth it to me.
A lot of people do see the point though, and
actually, they oftentimes become very attached to these people that they are
studying. Sometimes they even want to continue living and learning in this
culture beyond the timespan of the report. I can see why this is such a common
thing. If you spend all your days and nights with a people, you cannot help but
to see them as family. You can easily grow to love them and not want to go back
to your old way of living.
This is where a lot of biased information comes in
though. You either haven’t be in a culture long enough to be accepted, so you
don’t see the true meaning of an action. You would start making assumptions,
and these assumptions are often wrong. The opposite side has problems too. If
you are accepted into a culture enough that you see the true impact of an
action or ritual, you are probably too attached to them in my opinion to give
an honest unbiased description of the action.
That is why many researchers, including Gary Alan
Fine, correctly claim there is no way to truly be fair and honest when completing
and ethnography. People are human and can only be so unbiased.
Thinking on all these things, I cannot help but
wonder how we are expected to complete one of these in such a short amount of
time. There is no way we would reach the level of acceptance that we would see
all aspects of a culture in the allotted time. It should be interesting to see
how far we can actually delve into a culture of our choosing, and I am excited
to be actively doing what I spent a whole Christmas break learning about.
No comments:
Post a Comment